I would like to inform our readers to be very careful of a Computer Worm 'Conficker' set to be active on April 1, 2009. Please do not open any suspicious or unknown e-mails and please update your anti-virus softwares.

WASHINGTON - President Obama ’s plan to widen United States involvement in Afghanistan came after an internal debate in which Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. warned against getting into a political and military quagmire, while military advisers argued that the Afghanistan war effort could be imperiled without even more troops.

All of the president’s advisers agreed that the primary goal in the region should be narrow — taking aim at Al Qaeda , as opposed to the vast attempt at nation-building the Bush administration had sought in Iraq. The question was how to get there.

The commanders in the field wanted a firmer and long-term commitment of more combat troops beyond the 17,000 that Mr. Obama had already promised to send , and a pledge that billions of dollars would be found to significantly expand the number of Afghan security forces.

In announcing a plan on Friday that could be his signature foreign policy effort, Mr. Obama said that he would send more troops — some 4,000 — but stipulated that they would not carry out combat missions, and would instead be used to train the Afghan Army and the national police. He left himself open to the possibility of sending more as the situation warrants.

In light of this news, here is my question to you:-

Q:- Do you support President Obama's decision of sending more troops to Afghanistan?

Please leave your comments and opinions.

(CNN) Sandra Giustina is a 61-year-old uninsured American. For three years she saved her money in hopes of affording heart surgery to correct her atrial fibrillation. "They [U.S. hospitals] told me it would be about $175,000, and there was just no way could I come up with that," Giustina said.

So, with a little digging online, she found several high quality hospitals vying for her business, at a fraction of the U.S. cost. Within a month, she was on a plane from her home in Las Vegas, Nevada, to New Delhi, India. Surgeons at Max Hospital fixed her heart for "under $10,000 total, including travel."

Giustina is just one of millions around the world journeying outside their native land for medical treatment, a phenomenon known as "medical tourism." Experts say the trend in global health care has just begun. Next year alone, an estimated 6 million Americans will travel abroad for surgery, according to a 2008 Deloitte study. "Medical care in countries such as India, Thailand and Singapore can cost as little as 10 percent of the cost of comparable care in the United States," the report found.

In light of this latest news, here is my question to you:-

Do you think its safe for American patients to go abroad for their treatment?

Please leave your comments and opinions by clicking on 'Comments' link at the top right corner.

At the news conference Tuesday night, President Obama expressed solidarity with those who are outraged that AIG executives were awarded $165 million in bonuses at a time the company was being propped up by billions in federal rescue funds, but he also urged Americans to keep their focus on the big picture.

Obama touted his proposal to overhaul the financial regulatory system — Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is slated to unveil more details Thursday — and pushed for his budget. Obama heads to Capitol Hill today to defend his budget plan.

The 57-minute question-and-answer forum in the East Room, Obama's second prime-time news conference, came six weeks and a political lifetime after his first one. Since then, he has signed the $787 billion stimulus package and unveiled his $3.6 trillion budget. He's announced his plans to withdraw most U.S. troops from Iraq and to deploy additional troops to Afghanistan.

During those six weeks, the economy has gotten worse; even with Monday's triple-digit rally, the Dow Jones industrial average is 610.66 points lower than it was on Feb. 9. What's more, Republicans generally have united behind a strategy of opposing the administration's economic plans as ill-conceived and too expensive. Although his job-approval rating remains a healthy 63% in the Gallup daily tracking poll, pressure is building for Obama to show concrete results.

In light of this latest development, here is my question to you:-

Do you approve of President Obama's budget plan?

Please leave your comments and answers by clicking on the 'comments' link at the top right hand corner.

The government cannot fix the worst banking crisis since the Great Depression on its own. But the Obama administration is adamant that if given the right incentives, investors' goal for profits will help revive lending and put the economy back on track.

In laying out the government's plan to partner with the private sector to buy as much as $1 trillion in bad assets, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said it was the best option to deal with a vexing problem that has plagued both the Bush and Obama administrations.

The government's plan is to get the toxic loans and securities off banks' balance sheets so that banks can raise money and lend to creditworthy customers. Without such lending, the economy is expected to remain mired in a recession that is already the deepest in decades.

For specific details of the bank rescue plan, click here to--> Read the Full Article


In light of this latest development, here is my question to you:-

Will the potential of profits lure the private investors' to join the bank rescue plan with the government?

Please leave your comments/opinions by clicking on the comments link at the right hand corner.

President Obama is scheduled to hold his second prime-time news conference tomorrow at 8 p.m. ET. It's all-but-certain the subjects he will be asked about will include the troubled economy, the $165 million in bonuses paid to executives at insurance giant AIG and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and several other issues.

If you were given a chance to be present at this news conference:-

What would you ask President Obama?

Please leave your comments by clicking on the comments link (at the top right corner).

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Big money often spurs big battles. A month after President Obama signed the $787 billion economic stimulus law, governors and state lawmakers are already fighting with Washington and each other about putting the money to use.

At least two governors are asking the White House for special consideration in applying the funds meant to shore up state budgets.

And several governors, saying they don't want to expand eligibility, have turned down millions of dollars of unemployment benefits. This, in turn, has pitted some against their own state legislatures and prompted some lawmakers to threaten to take matters into their own hands.

In light of this latest development, here's my question to you:-

What do you think about some states refusing to take the stimulus money?

Please leave your comments and answers.